Annulment of expulsion sanction
EXPULSION SANCTION
As immigration lawyers we have 20 years of experience in the field of immigration, 99% of efficiency in appeals on immigration sanctions of expulsion and fine, we add examples of real cases sentenced annulling the expulsion.
In case of expulsion, it is necessary to file a contentious appeal, in this section we present judgments of Bufete obtaining the ANNULMENT OF EXPULSION.
judgment upholds appeal Fbernal Abogados cancels EXPULSION
CONTENTIOUS APPEAL AGAINST EXPULSION – ANNULLING THE EXPULSION FOR A FINE
SUSPENSION OF URGENT EXPULSION, JUDGMENT TO FBERNAL ABOGADOS by which we obtained the suspension of flight to country of origin in execution of expulsion and fixed within the same day expulsion, we filed an appeal for injunction, a remarkably effective resource given our experience obtaining a suspension of urgent expulsion.
MODEL CONTENTIOUS APPEAL ON EXPULSION AND JUDGMENT ANNULLING EXPULSION
EXPULSION CANCELLED IN CONTENTITIOUS APPEAL UPHELD BY THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF MADRID to our client.
We present you the Sentence dictated in the Contentious Court of Toledo 2, in which we obtained the substitution of the expulsion by fine, where we obtained the suspension of the expulsion in the term of 3 months from the presentation of the appeal, in this case the client did not have roots in Spain and thanks to our experience of more than 10 years in foreigners, we obtained alleging sanctioning defects of the administration, ALWAYS AVOIDING THE DISPROTECTION OF THE CLIENT IN THE EVENT OF A POSSIBLE POLICE DETENTION.For any doubt, please contact us.
JDO. CONTENTIOUS/ADMTVO. N. 2
TOLEDO
01600
MARQUES DE MENDIGORRIA, 2
Unique Identification Number: 45168 45 3 2009 0200465
Procedure: PROCEDIMIENTO ABREVIADO 0000284 12009 D
About STATE ADMINISTRATION
From D/ña. .
Representative Mr./Mrs. Mr./Ms. PEDRO FERNANDEZ BERNAL
Against Mr./Ms. SUBDELEGADO DEL GOBIERNO EN TOLEDO
Representative Mr./Ms. Mr./Ms. STATE ATTORNEY
SENTENCE No. 58
In TOLEDO, on the eighteenth day of March two thousand and eleven.
On behalf of H.M. THE KING, the Hon. Mrs. MARIA LUISA
CASAL FERNANDEZ, Substitute Magistrate-Judge of the Contentious-
Administrative n ” 2 of TOLEDO and its Party, having seen
the present proceedings of ADVOCATE PROCEDURE N° 284/2009-0
followed before this Court, between parts, of a as
appellant Don RONALD S. represented and
defended by Counsel Mr. PEDRO FERNANDEZ BERNAL and on the other
as defendant the SUBDELEGACIÓN DEL GOBIERNO EN TOLEDO,
represented by the STATE ATTORNEY.
BACKGROUND OF THE FACTS
FIRST. The representation of
filed a contentious-administrative appeal
resolution issued by the SUBDELEGACIÓN DEL GOBIERNO EN
dated January 30, 2009.
SECOND.
– After the appropriate procedural steps, which can be seen in the proceedings, the parties were summoned to the hearing
scheduled for March 15, 2011, which was held
with the appearance of the aforementioned parties, with
the result that can be seen in the minutes of the trial, leaving the
proceedings concluded and ready to issue a sentence.
THIRD. In the processing of this proceeding, all legal formalities have been
complied with.PRlMERO.- By the procedural representation of Mr. RONALD ,
cancellation of the expulsion sanction
A contentious
administrative appeal is filed against the resolution issued by the Subdelegate
of the Government in Toledo dated January 30, 2009, by
which decrees the expulsion of the appellant from the Spanish territory
and prohibits him from entering Spain and the countries
mentioned for a period of five years. It is formulated as a
claim that the administrative act
appealed against be declared null and void and, in the alternative, that the expulsion be replaced by a fine
. The State Attorney
opposes this claim and considers that the appeal should be dismissed, requesting
, in the alternative, the imposition of a fine of 500 €.
JUDGMENT That the Appeal
Contentious-Administrative filed by Mr. S. against the administrative resolution issued
by the Subdelegate of the Government in Toledo, dated January 30
, 2009, which decrees the expulsion of the appellant
from Spanish territory and prohibits her from entering Spain and
in the countries mentioned for a period of five years, should be upheld and partially upheld . And
I must partially annul the appealed decision, annulling the
sanction of expulsion from Spanish territory and replacing it with
that of a fine of 500 Euros.